Sunday, December 27, 2015
What does relativity's geocentric model look like?
I was asked a question on a YouTube forum about what the absolute Geocentric model of the universe looks like. I decided to turn the question around. Everyone seems quick and eager (CoolHardLogic, anyone?) to claim victory in debunking the geocentric reference frame. But hold on a second - relativity contains a geocentric reference frame. So if all the geocentric models put forth by absolute geocentrists can be debunked, then what exactly do the relativists think their own geocentric model is? Since they've got a geocentric reference frame, they MUST have their own geocentric model of the universe. So what does it look like? I explain EXACTLY what it looks like in the following two videos. And (spoilers ahead)surprise, surprise, it looks exactly like the most current geocentric models that the relativists have allegedly debunked. Brings to mind an image of Barney Fife shooting himself in the foot as he attempts to draw his pistol.
Thursday, December 24, 2015
These are The Undeniable Facts:
1) A relativist can only say that Earth is in relative motion. If you say something, such as the Earth, is definitely in motion, then you are in violation of relativity.
2) We, the observers on Earth, are at the center of our own observable universe. This is what the empirical evidence says. Both relativists and absolute Geocentrists acknowledge this.
3) Absolute Geocentrists say that our (we, the observers on Earth) observable universe is all that there is to the universe. There is nothing beyond our observable universe.
4) If our own observable universe is the entire universe, and we are at the center of it, the Earth can be empirically shown (interferometer experiments) to be at absolute rest. Therefore if our own observable universe is all that there is, Earth is immobile at the center of the universe.
5) According to standard Big Bang theory, anything beyond our (we, the observers on Earth) observable universe will be forever unobservable to us due to the expansion of space.
6) Things that are unobservable do not exist as far as science is concerned. Therefore anything beyond our observable universe does not exist as far as science is concerned. How could it, since the ability to observe something is a requirement of the scientific method?
7) If 4) is correct then relativity is false, because Earth is a preferred, special reference frame, defining an absolute rest frame.
8) The only way 4) can be false is if there is a larger universe beyond our (we, the observers on Earth) observable universe.
9) Therefore, both relativity and the Copernican principle require the existence of a universe beyond our observable universe, i.e. both require something that is beyond the scope of the scientific method and rational scientific inquiry.
10) Mainstream science claims that there is a larger universe beyond our observable universe. They MUST claim this, because both relativity and the Copernican principle require it (see 9)) Google “the observable universe vs. the entire universe.”
11) Relativity is presented to the public as scientific fact.
12) Therefore, relativity is pseudo-science.
13) The only options available to us are absolute Geocentrism or relativistic geocentrism.
14) Relativity is a pseudo-science, therefore the only option available to strict adherents to science is absolute Geocentrism.
Earth is at absolute rest at the center of the universe as far as science is concerned. Relativists are the kooks, not the Geocentrists. Case closed, class dismissed.
1) A relativist can only say that Earth is in relative motion. If you say something, such as the Earth, is definitely in motion, then you are in violation of relativity.
2) We, the observers on Earth, are at the center of our own observable universe. This is what the empirical evidence says. Both relativists and absolute Geocentrists acknowledge this.
3) Absolute Geocentrists say that our (we, the observers on Earth) observable universe is all that there is to the universe. There is nothing beyond our observable universe.
4) If our own observable universe is the entire universe, and we are at the center of it, the Earth can be empirically shown (interferometer experiments) to be at absolute rest. Therefore if our own observable universe is all that there is, Earth is immobile at the center of the universe.
5) According to standard Big Bang theory, anything beyond our (we, the observers on Earth) observable universe will be forever unobservable to us due to the expansion of space.
6) Things that are unobservable do not exist as far as science is concerned. Therefore anything beyond our observable universe does not exist as far as science is concerned. How could it, since the ability to observe something is a requirement of the scientific method?
7) If 4) is correct then relativity is false, because Earth is a preferred, special reference frame, defining an absolute rest frame.
8) The only way 4) can be false is if there is a larger universe beyond our (we, the observers on Earth) observable universe.
9) Therefore, both relativity and the Copernican principle require the existence of a universe beyond our observable universe, i.e. both require something that is beyond the scope of the scientific method and rational scientific inquiry.
10) Mainstream science claims that there is a larger universe beyond our observable universe. They MUST claim this, because both relativity and the Copernican principle require it (see 9)) Google “the observable universe vs. the entire universe.”
11) Relativity is presented to the public as scientific fact.
12) Therefore, relativity is pseudo-science.
13) The only options available to us are absolute Geocentrism or relativistic geocentrism.
14) Relativity is a pseudo-science, therefore the only option available to strict adherents to science is absolute Geocentrism.
Earth is at absolute rest at the center of the universe as far as science is concerned. Relativists are the kooks, not the Geocentrists. Case closed, class dismissed.
Monday, December 21, 2015
Stephen Hawking, relativists and anti-geocentrists get taken to school
A little graphic I made today. If you right-click on the image and select "save image as," you can download this to your computer for easier zooming. The kid is me, of course, forty-some years ago.
Wednesday, November 25, 2015
Video Transcription: Part 1 of Death to Einstein! The Center of the Observable Universe Flaw
This is the first part of the transcription of my video Death to Einstein! The Center of the Observable Universe Flaw. It's a LONG video, and hence is going to be a long transcription, so I'm posting it in parts as I work on it. This first part covers about the first 1/3 of the video.
Video on Youtube: https://youtu.be/U7oP1OfJ4_I
Video on Archive.org: https://archive.org/details/DeathToEinsteinTheCenterOfTheObservableUniverseFlaw
Again, this is unedited. Also, there's a lot going on in the video that doesn't translate to text, so some of the transcription might not make sense without the video, but I'm doing it anyway.
Death to Einstein! The Center of the Observable Universe Flaw
I did a Google here on “the observable universe.” The first
result is Wikipedia: “The observable universe consists of the galaxies and
other matter that can in principle be observed from Earth at the present time.”
How big is the observable universe? 46.5 billion light
years. How far is the edge? Something wrong with these figures here.
Anyway, there’s the observable universe. How big is the
universe? The diameter of the observable universe is a sphere around 92 billion
light years. Has a radius of 46 billion light years.
The observable universe is basically everything we can see.
Let me pull up Wikipedia here just to have something to read.
“The observable
universe consists of the galaxies and other matter that can in principle be
observed from Earth at the present time because light and other signals from
these objects have had time to reach the Earth since the beginning of
expansion.”
So look, this diagram here is a bunch of stars enclosed in a
sphere.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)